Search for: "Sais v. No Named Defendants" Results 1 - 20 of 9,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 7:08 am by Daily Record Staff
(the “corporate codefendants”)—were named as defendants in a lawsuit, filed by Sai Wang, ... [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
  The post Domain Name Registrar Isn’t Liable for Hijacked Domain Name–Rigsby v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
The originally named defendants in the case included the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 6:52 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
City of Haverhill – Massachusetts Supreme Court Weighs Slip-and-Fall Claim, May 23, 2014, Boston Personal Injury Attorney Blog The post Snapchat Named Defendant in Personal Injury Lawsuit appeared first on Boston Personal Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:20 pm by Evan Brown
 But when the time came to put the domain name in escrow to enable transfer, defendant backed out of the deal, saying he had changed his mind. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:05 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says: The only pleaded basis for GoDaddy’s knowledge that the Website would be used to infringe is the Li Defendants’ conduct using other websites and the Prior Action. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 11:08 am
The Court reasoned, at paragraph 57 of the Grounds of Decision, that “it cannot lie in the mouth of a defendant to say that his acts were in accordance with honest practices if those acts were in fact motivated by a lack of bona fides. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:42 am by Howard Wasserman
I do not have much to say about Nunes v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:01 pm by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts Texas Court Says that Plaintiffs Who Failed to Provide Proof of Diligence in Late Service Effectively Missed the Statute of Limitations – Perez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:01 pm by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts Texas Court Says that Plaintiffs Who Failed to Provide Proof of Diligence in Late Service Effectively Missed the Statute of Limitations – Perez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:27 pm by Shea Denning
The name on the license—Keith Leak—matched the name on the registration. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Intent was neutral: Defendants copied the name, but there was a convincing explanation for choosing the name on the merits, unrelated to the plaintiffs’ goodwill. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
Names...Last month, the Nigerian Federal High Court delivered its judgment in the case of Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Ltd/Gte (MCSN) v Copyright Society of Nigeria Ltd/Gte (COSON) and 2 Others (FHC/L/CS/274/2010), directing the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AG) to take necessary steps to cancel/rescind the change of name of the 1st Defendant, COSON. [read post]